De Cotta McKenna & Santafé 4th Anniversary

De Cotta McKenna & Santafé Appeal One Case in Two Courts in Two Countries at One Time

5 August 2009

Case No. HS03D00476 in the County Court of Hastings, England rumbles on. So does the same case in Malaga, Spain. De Cotta McKenna & Santafé are the well known  law firm in Spain who are bringing the case to Court or should that be bringing these cases to Courts?

The company are well aware that they have acted illegally to enforce a mis-translated English Court Order since August 5th 2005 on behalf of their client Valerie Celia Russell. They are also aware they were denied that miscarriage of justice on 21st January and again at appeal in March of this year in Torrox Court in Spain.

Appeal number 2 is lodged with the High Court in Malaga, Spain while appeal number 3 is due for a hearing on 16th September in Hastings, England. Which Court will have the authority over the other? Which decision will Jon Sutton, the partner of De Cotta McKenna & Santafé conducting the case in England decide to act upon?

Indeed, is this  legal?

Were this not such a serious matter one could almost laugh at the antics which are reminiscent of spoilt children running between their parents until they get what they want.

Meanwhile, the English Court Order could have been honoured on a number of occasions and still can be as I write but for the careless and incorrect wording of the original Court Order laid down by District Judge Pollard (then Deputy). Edward Kirwan, the respondent, has buyers for the property which will allow him to honour the Court Order yet both De Cotta McKenna & Santafé and the wording of the Hastings Court Order are denying him that privilege.

On this 4th anniversary of Jon Sutton’s mystic reading of the translated Court Order, (see this post) let me leave you with this thought…

De Cotta McKenna & Santafé – Appealing or Appalling?

Subscribe in a reader

Injustice in Europe with Blogcatalog

Please leave comments below.